Guided legal requests
Problem: incomplete information or facts mixed with the requested task.
A guided process collects context, purpose, data and attachments before analysis.
Result: a structured request that is easier to review and assign.
Features linked to the workflowFrom raw material to a reviewable result.
Each feature supports a working step: collecting information, preparing the case file, analyzing content, reviewing the result and retaining its context.
Documents and OCR
Problem: mixed case files and scanned PDFs.
The system can identify image-based PDFs and link OCR conversion to the work request.
Result: content prepared for analysis and review, still linked to the case file.
Private sources and archive
Problem: scattered precedents and internal knowledge.
Reusable document workspaces provide technical or operational context for analysis.
Result: knowledge that is easier to access and connected to the firm's work.
Word templates
Problem: drafts that require manual reconstruction of structure and formatting.
The firm's templates guide the structure, style and formatting of generated documents.
Result: a first draft closer to internal standards, still requiring review.
Multi-document analysis
Problem: facts, dates and issues spread across documents and attachments.
iurisMind can compare documents in the same case file and produce coordinated outputs.
Result: a cross-document view that helps the professional plan the review.
Emails and voice memos
Problem: operational information scattered across channels.
Emails can feed requests; voice memos can save a transcript and context to the case file.
Result: fewer manual steps and less risk of losing information.
Cases, tasks and teams
Problem: AI separated from day-to-day case management.
Requests, projects, tasks, case files, team members, roles and permissions can share one working model.
Result: work remains connected to clients, responsibilities and case status.
Contextual assistant
Problem: features that are hard to find or use at the right time.
An integrated assistant can help users find features and suggest next steps within the context of the case.
Result: more gradual adoption and a clearer workflow.
Persistent history
Problem: starting from scratch with every new analysis.
The request retains original documents, context and analysis history.
Result: continuity and the ability to reconstruct the work performed.
Availability to confirm during a demo
Configuration, modules and integrations may vary by environment and usage profile. The demo helps confirm which options are available for an individual professional, team or enterprise setting.
Which features does your workflow need?
We start from your existing requests, documents and working steps to define a useful scope.